When Apple CEO Tim Cook and big names go virtual on May 7 to unveil the new iPads, they’ll spend a lot of time building one thing: The new iPads will be the most productive tablets on the market, especially the Pro models. We may already be looking forward to the situation that Cook and his team will find to promote the latest iPads, adding OLED presentations and slimmer bodies, the new Airs getting a larger screen size, and updates to the Apple Pencil and Magic Keyboard.
The iPad is certainly a wonderful product. Neither the iPhone nor the Mac destroyed the iPad, so the tablet’s continued lifestyle more than a decade after its release is evidence that other people need a device that stands out to bridge the gap between the iPhone and the Mac. Some might argue that the iPhone does everything the iPad is capable of and, to some extent, they’re right. However, the portability that the device presents, especially the iPad Mini, and the help of the pen make it a delightful product. The iPad Pro, on the other hand Although it’s a more complex device and there are valid arguments against the device, it’s hard to question the Pro-style lifestyle as a whole.
The challenge with the iPad has never been the hardware. Apple has updated iPads to have the most productive hardware imaginable and drool-worthy specs, especially the top-of-the-line iPad Pro. But where the iPad fails is in the iPadOS software, which is still very limited in making the tablet more adaptable to painting tasks, for which users opt for a Windows PC or Mac.
While many people have criticized Apple for not installing macOS on the iPad and fixing the software once and for all, Apple possibly won’t. Cupertino has already made it clear that it will never put macOS on the iPad. Look, the iPad is rarely very much a Mac, either in shape or feel. It’s something different, and other people buy an iPad for reasons that may not be the same as those that justify buying a Mac. iPad supports Apple Pencil, and you can use the stylus to draw or draw, but your Mac doesn’t. The same goes for the Magic Keyboard, which adds a keyboard to the iPad, and it’s a smart keyboard considering it also comes with a decent-sized trackpad. .
What many other people occasionally say is that if the iPad becomes the Swiss Army knife and is smart about everything, then what good is the Mac?There’s an explanation for why Apple also makes the Mac and still sells the iPad. The argument is that if Apple adds macOS to the iPad, it would make the tablet look like the Mac won’t hold up. MacOS was never designed to be used with one finger on a portable device. However, it’s also true that Apple can raise the iPad to a safe level. Level, even with accessories.
But that still doesn’t replace the fact that Apple can do a lot with the iPad’s software. It just requires the will to do it. And it all starts with such fundamental things as separate user profiles, which are the most requested feature on the iPad. But Apple completely ignored it. Multi-account support on a device like the iPad makes a lot of sense: after all, a tablet is used across families (unlike the iPhone, which is a less public device). This is a shared device and is either too expensive or it is not practical to buy one for each individual. The ability to set up multiple user profiles on the iPad can increase iPad sales in the long run, rather than minimize them, as Apple might worry. If the iPad is shared between users, it will only expand the use of the pill and likely generate subscriptions to Apple facilities through higher tiers.
While multitasking has made strides in iPadOS 17, there’s still room for improvement. But some things are still a mess, and hardcore iPad users can’t use iPadOS for heavy multitasking workloads. In iPadOS, users are limited to 4 apps on the screen at a time. , and Apple continues to limit the length and position of apps to some extent. On a MacBook, you can keep tabs and apps open on one screen at a time, and you have a lot more freedom to have fun. A MacBook can do more than the iPad.
It’s not that Apple hasn’t made any progress in introducing desktop apps to the iPad. Final Cut Pro on iPad has been a hit with many editors, and the long history of desktop apps on iPad is brilliant, to say the least. FCP on iPad is capable, though it’s not exactly a desktop edition found on Mac. Professional-grade app comparisons will be made between an iPad edition and a desktop edition, however, apps like FCP on the iPad show that desktop apps need to be redesigned if used on a device like the iPad, as the entire interface and workflows are now optimized for touch. This means that the way you edit on iPad or Mac will also replace touch. But that doesn’t take away from the fact that FCP is a running editor on iPad but not a full-fledged studio from filming to publishing, as Apple likes. market.
Although the iPad is a rugged device, it’s hard to please everyone. Not even a MacBook can do everything we want, and neither can other devices. Right now, the most productive solution for Apple is to revel in software. iPad. iPadOS doesn’t have to look more like macOS or offer macOS-like multitasking. What might work for the iPad is the way it builds the software and adjusts multitasking so that it’s better optimized for touch, taking shape into account.
All eyes are on Apple’s WWDC event in early June, where the company announces iPadOS 18, the next edition of the operating formula that powers the iPad. There are all sorts of rumors surrounding iPadOS 18 and how AI will put more emphasis on the software side. Hopefully, Apple will do the iPad justice and bring the differentiated software and app experience the device desires to the fullest right now.