Amazon and Google fight gallantly to remain applicable. Whether or not they are applicable or not a lot of billions of investments.
To what more than a few readers will ask what can be meant through the previous comment. Among other things, Amazon and Google dominate purchases and studies on the fact that we know under the call of the Internet, respectively. The very concept that they will have to fight for relevance vandalize not an unusual sense. In fact, it would be the point of view of federal officials who have harassed the two corporations with all kinds of antitrust procedures in recent years.
Of course, what is lost for the forced federal through the known is that, in regard to the industry in the maximum dynamic country of the economy, the probation remains the past. Inventory markets tell us why.
For investors, the offer is already “price” in the market. They need to know what corporations will do in the future, and specifically what the proportional corporations will do to remain applicable in the future.
All this explains Google’s plans in 2025 for $ 75 billion in investments largely connected to AI, as well as Amazon’s purpose of putting $ one hundred billion to paintings. Hopefully the 75 and one hundred billion dollars exist as vital reminders that, whatever the opinion of the federal government antitrust officials, Amazon and Google do not paint at all monopoly. In any case, fashion paintings start in a desperate search to notice a long race that is far from being safe.
Especially the cash they put at work, what selection of Amazon and Google do they have? Other eminent American technological names such as Meta and Microsoft also invest massive sums in AI, Ai-Adjacent and other efforts in search of the future, not to mention the vast sums put in service through capital, clearly the players of the dangers established in the technology . The investment in VC is to know how to contemplate.
This is due to the fact that for the forced antitrust officials through the known, it is the career of an idiot so that the VC puts in cash the new companies that try to achieve the impossible, which revoked the existing technology of the giants. It is lost through opponents, however, it is the advertising style of the VC to invest in “impossible” concepts that are renewed. Although they will fail in the north of 90% of the time, very rare successes will pay more than for all failures. What is the point?
It is not just that Amazon and Google compete with others described as “Big Tech”, is that great technology tests are a magnet for much more investment through intrepid VCS for the search for today’s new companies that will evaluate the great descriptor Technological tomorrow. In other words, abundant good fortune that some wanderingly describe as “monopoly” does not deter the investment, but is the greatest motor force of it.
This once explains why Amazon and Google, so here and now they paint as if they were startups. They have no choice. In business, The Beyond and The proportion are ugly signs of the future.