Most readers of The-Technology are no doubt familiar with the Faraday cage, at least by name, and almost everyone has one: If you’ve ever seen a bag of popcorn slowly spin inside the waves of a microphone, you’ve seen Michael Faraday’s 1836 invention in action. However, despite being a well-known device, the average hacker still doesn’t have one in their arsenal. But why?
It may be that there is a certain mystique about Faraday cages, the assumption that their structure requires techniques or materials outside the realm of the home hacker. While it’s true that building an optimal Faraday cage for a given frequency comes from math and attention to detail, creating an undeniable style for general purposes of use and experimentation is quick and easy.
As part of a minimalist hacking exercise, I recently built a basic Faraday cage using fabric obtained from Home Depot, and I thought it would be cool to not only describe its construction, but also give some ideas on how it can be put into practice in the world. house. laboratory. While not the best example, it obviously works and nothing was needed that couldn’t be received locally, almost anywhere in the world.
At the fundamental maximum level, a Faraday cage is an enclosure made of conductive fabric that blocks electromagnetic fields. Compared to a Faraday shield, the cage variant is not a forged object, but rather a network of cords. Among other advantages, this allows the subject to be observed inside the cage. Bottom line: if you just need to protect a device from interference (or prevent it from causing interference), simply enclose it in a steel case; But if you need something you can experiment with, you probably need a cage.
The trick is to make sure that the holes in the cage curtains are smaller than the wavelength you want to block. It’s the same precept that allows you to use the popular cord mesh as an RF reflector whenever you’re running at low frequencies. But as the target frequency increases, the wavelength becomes small enough to be able to pass through the screen, so you’ll want to use something tighter. But how small is it?
To start, we need to find the wavelength for the frequency we want to block. This can be found by dividing the wave’s speed in meters per second by its frequency in hertz. As we’re dealing with a radio wave we know it will be traveling at the speed of light, and for the frequency let’s say we want to block 2.4GHz. So the math will look like:
The general rule for a Faraday cage is that the openings do not exceed 1/10 of the wavelength, which in our case is 12. 5 mm (about 1/2 inch). Fortunately, metal “screens” with 1/2″ and 1/4″ mesh are widely available. On paper, either works, but I ended up choosing the 1/4″ to be safe.
With the mesh in hand, the next step is to build some kind of frame for it. As it so happens, Home Depot has wooden crates in their storage section which are strong and relatively cheap. You could also construct a frame from pieces of wood or PVC pipe, which may end up being cheaper if you don’t mind taking the time to build it.
I had a couple of slats come out of one side of the box to make it easier to see a look, but beyond that, the structure just wraps the box with the hardware cloth. I made a long piece that started at the front and wrapped all the way to the back, then two smaller pieces to “style” the looks. At the end of the day, it’s not completely different from gift wrapping; If the wrapping paper is steel and has an unpleasant finish to cut you, anyway.
One thing to pay close attention to is where pieces of the mesh overlap. You want to maintain a good electrical connection and avoid any gaps, so you should overlap the pieces by at least a couple of inches to be safe. I attached the hardware cloth to the crate with a power stapler, so I also made sure to drive a few extra staples through the areas where the mesh overlapped to ensure they were held together tightly.
As undeniable proof, I benched my phone running the signal strength function of the “WiFi Analyzer” app for Android, with a point one floor up decided as the target. In the two photos below, the only thing that has been replaced from one photo to the next is the self-made Faraday cage on the phone that stands out.
As you can see, the telephone had a signal strength of about -55 dBm originally, and it dropped to almost -80 dBm inside the cage. Weaker Wi-Fi networks became undetectable when the phone entered the cage, which had an obviously negative effect. effect on the phone’s LTE reception.
I should say, before the commenters below get a chance to do it for me, that this is admittedly not a very good Faraday cage. For one, it’s not fully enclosed. Since there’s no bottom signals are still able to enter from below, greatly reducing its effectiveness. The steel mesh is also not an ideal conductor, and copper would likely work better. But finding a local source of tightly wound copper mesh proved tricky.
There is also debate as to whether or not a Faraday cage deserves to be grounded. For what it’s worth, my tests didn’t show any substitution in functionality when the cage was grounded. Although it’s conceivable that a more traditional Faraday cage would work differently.
That said, I still think this design blocks RF enough to be useful. It will never completely isolate the device from electromagnetic interference (or vice versa), but it does attenuate the signals enough to be obviously observable. That’s the extent of my ambition at the start, so I’m satisfied with the result.
Imagine you are developing or testing a remotely controlled device, and want to see how it behaves when signal strength is poor. Tossing the cage over it would allow you to induce a drop in signal strength instantaneously. Or perhaps you’re observing the RF emissions of a device, but want to cut-down on superfluous background noise. Putting the piece of gear under test and your SDR hardware inside the cage would be an easy way to study it in a less “noisy” environment.
These are just two possibilities. This demonstration shows that there is no clever explanation for why you shouldn’t have an undeniable RF blocking device. It’s cheap, it works, and it can be your next weekend project. What you do with it is up to you, just be sure to send us a message. What would you use/use a Faraday cage for?
If you are isolating a small RF device, you can go to the hardware store and get a gallon paint can with a lid and use that. With the lid sealed, NO RF comes out. I have used it to verify or isolate many RF AMI endpoints with wonderful success. You can even insert RF connectors into the canopy and install a coaxial cable or internal antenna for meacertainment or to make sure the desired signal is the only thing coming. outside, without virtual noise or parasitic emissions. And it’s CHEAP!
We had about 50 things to set up and check on one site. There was a lot of noise in the workplace because of all its emissions. The design was such that in order to turn them off, the batteries had to be removed from each one. . . . We’ll put them in the microwave in the break room. I deserve to have an idea of an unused can of paint, that would have been a much better solution.
In fact, “Daniel, can you swap those beacons for others. . . And while I’m here, can I have a coffee?” 🙂
Next week I’ll be performing a BLE beacon task. I’m going to get an old paint can (since most new ones appear to be plastic!) and build a faulty Faraday cage to simulate RSSI settings more easily than tossing them down the aisle.
Put an antenna inside the can, at a junction. And a variable dimmer and an antenna outside the can.
Go to a farm store (places that sell to farmers and such). Metal pails easy to get.
The Home Depot sells new or empty steel paint cans in the paint department. Ideal for storing portable radios and batteries. A removed kitchen microwave (appliance) is also great. It’s a Faraday cage with a moderate garage space hollow for your treats. Place it on the rafters of the attic or garage so as not to disturb your wife. 🙂
I thought the dummy rates were just this: a resistor in a steel paint can.
Don’t forget the oil! It greatly increases the possible power dissipation.
I am pretty sure that most people do not own a Microwave.
I own many microwaves. I can’t really do much with them anymore though as they have traveled out into the stars where i have no way to retrieve them. Fortunately I can make more whenever I need to.
Do you really want to call this “owning”? 🙂
It’s a bit like having a pet. To me, using the possessive makes sense for anything that is created at a source point that radiates outward. I don’t forget in elementary school, “Yes, Mrs. Blaskovich, that was Jimmy’s. “These school chairs with wooden seats may sound like a Stradivarius. 🙂 )
What are you thinking of? He clearly was referring to a microwave oven, which are very common.
I think he means “most people” in a broader sense. If you step out of our first-world bubble, he’s right; Most humans don’t own microwaves.
Anyone who can read this will at least have access to a computer.
I doubt many other people in dust huts read The-Technology either, but here we are.
Many homeless people at Starbucks own computers. I once saw a homeless user who stared because he had taken his computer tower to Starbucks and placed it on the table in the middle of the store while doing all the things other homeless people did on their laptops at Starbucks.
Everyone has a microwave, and if you just need quick insulation, place your device in the oven (don’t turn it on. . . ).
Good air seekers can turn off microwaves, and you can empty them and plug in the bulb to light up the interior if you want to see what’s going on inside.
Instead of using hardware cloth, you’ll most likely get more functionality with an aluminum mosquito net, and it’s probably cheaper. But you can’t weld it smoothly, so you have to make mechanical connections.
You can get even more functionality by making a double-walled cage. If you get 25 dB in one layer, you’ll get 50 dB in 2 layers. I sat in such a cage and operated an oscilloscope while a megawatt-level pulse transmitter sounded a few feet away. Built with a copper screen.
You can use old washing machine cases.
At lower frequencies, I assume an anechoic chamber design is needed for audible levels and therefore if the steel is thick enough; Steel can resonate to some extent to create other combinations, sun sun sun shadows and sun sun shadows depending on the design, the tension, I guess or just the resonance of the design contemplating the sun sun sun shadows if the steel is forged in relation to a screen. Because of the harmonics of the drum diaphragms, they elicit more signals because they are more than just basic frequency harmonics typical of other designs.
Bury a shipping container between modules at least four feet underground and assume an inlet and outlet baffle and filtering, as well as an optocoupling or isolation transformer coupling with spectrum tracking at those points. Perhaps the solution would be a coating such as an anechoic chamber.
A man who owns a submarine said the same thing about the low electromagnetic fields that can pass underwater if, for example, an underwater formula is used if necessary. From what I’ve read, it’s not mandatory. I think it’s the submarine for other recreational purposes, I guess.
I use a 325 stainless steel metal mesh sieve cut to be compatible with the lid of the NIDO Milk Powder Can to complement the metal coating on my milk carton that I used for short-range determinations and the radio directional search.
I also made sure to use an aluminum screen for the entrances and exits of my farm construction, which is covered in metal, there is still room for improvement where more elaborate designs are used, especially I think, windows covered with copper screens or maybe there are tints. they are effective at more than the AM diversity I’ve been looking for.
At high frequencies in microwaves and more. . . Welding seams are needed and special reflective fabrics do not damage either, i. e. some oxides, for example, when you get it in the infrared range, are better known.
Are you experimenting with high-powered transmitters or are you just paranoid?
I didn’t realize that the above comment was going to be approved. My fault for the redundancy of thoughts.
I am a victim of interstate domestic violence and I am stalking through those who not only poisoned me using chemicals and potentially biological. . . They use weapons and attack tactics to probe, frame and brain and have even invaded my home, robbed me with weapons and the maimed, especially those who have been shot dead by malicious people, have lost their jobs and their police pensions.
“If you get 25 dB out of one layer, you’ll get 50 dB out of 2 layers.“
Or 28 dB, actually.
This guy is!
Around the world, you’re probably right. But I’m sure that in evolved countries many other people own one.
Tom: I think a good test for comparison would be to just stick your same phone in the microwave oven. Obviously, you do not want to turn it on, ha ha. Just see what your signals look like when inside it. It would also be good if you carried your oven to the same location that you tested your cage, or bring your cage near where your oven is. I have seen tests of microwave ovens where a cell phone was placed inside 5 different models and then called. If I recall, the phone rang in 3 of the 5 ovens showing some pretty good leakage. Pretty scary.
And yet, 3 out of five microwave owners show no symptoms of exposure. The radiation point needed to make a phone ring is incredibly different from the one needed to cause injury. After all, they’re not designed to block cellular signals.
It’s almost as if microdosing in chronic exposure doesn’t cause disorders unless it’s diagnosed, or even revealed as a cause, at a later date. . . such as banned pesticides, for example.
Using only microwaves from a home oven, I demonstrated in my university studies other synthetics with the same traditional hot plate heating strategies. As it turns out, I’ve proven that the mafia has this too.
I wonder if this caused me more follow-up, because I tried to check the use of other theoretical and known activity levels of microwave rotational bonds and IR vibrational bonds as well as a catalyst and see what effects on the products I devise are the energies of the resonants. The bonds would catalyze reactions that would cause the formation of express products in a calculated, correlated manner. It looked the same with MRI (Magnetic Transition Resonance) and UV-Vis/X/Gamma (Electronic Transition Resonance).
Microwaves are not ionizing radiation in which a “dose build-up” would occur. And I’m sure that in his experiments he’s used degrees of force at the places where the heating occurs.
Microwave reading causes immunosuppression and hormonal changes. From what I understand, the amounts are not at the degrees where the “warming” occurs. . . It doesn’t matter what you “hot”. Technically, any energy, unless it resonates sympathetically, will be converted into heat. These may simply be effects of lower-intensity pulse exercise that, such as microwave heating, can cause cavitation or stress disorders in sensitive structures such as capillaries, causing them to burst or even disorders of mast mobility that can cause scarring. time, impairing the integrity of the organ’s disposition and function.
I have worked with RF for many years. VLF a Band X. Au the early ’90s, the only recorded case of a user with cancer due to RF (and possibly would be) that of a guy running over the top of the Empire State Building in New York. City. Transmitter room. If there was a challenge with disease-causing RF exposure, I would expect it to be the airport staff who suffered the most. They are exposed to everything from HF radiation to microwave radar. All to degrees particularly higher than the majority of the public.
I am knowledgeable and assume, without having primary EE or RF engineering experience, that client systems would possibly not be harmful COTS. . . or at least as harmful if used safely. The systems that are harmful are those that are designed to be harmful. . . let’s say rather as collimated systems to generate problems such as a maser/laser (in theory, they can technically be nanoscopic) that can continue with ablation or mutate to cause fear, along with an immunocompramization that can lead to the spread of cells and tissues that are not meant to be where they are, RF cauterization tools, Cyber/Gamma knives, corrupted signals from AED systems (such as resetting center or EEG incorrectly), unreasonably used stun guns, lack of medical equipment, electronic ray guns, etc. Bob Iannini had some attractive designs from the 1980s and John William of Lonestarconsulting Inc. It shows that it is complicated to argue with logical systems. I mean. . . For $14, you can buy an RF cauterizing tool on those days.
I like to describe that the generation begins with the telegraph. Most don’t even realize the modulation and multiplexing used in the 19th century for this communication system. Now there are more complex DC and AC communication strategies that are not only stressed like our phones or in the past, the ones that were hardline wireless, there are also cell phones (like sleeper cells as well, although that’s another topic) that have maximum maximum policy everywhere with modulation and complex multiplexing that even rely on satellites that maximum of the planet is unaware of.
So, like the advanced tech most aren’t aware of that exists and now with satellite based systems coupled with the land, sea, air and cyber battlefields… who knows what space warrior operations are going on that can affect and assault without consent the minds of our youth in worse than MK Ultra Projects and other horrific mind control projects. This going on in the new frontier of the Electromagnetic Spectrum (EMS) Weapons systems to perform more than just sound assaults with intent to maim and murder… they can perform body and mind control assaults with intent to maim and murder operations.
See http://dewdetectionprojects. blogspot. com/2017/08/ first message and messages.
I forgot to write down some other source I read causing alarm. . . gamma ray resources used for inspections and I guess they irradiate maybe to disinfect. . . I think the disinfection systems are less powerful. I also don’t know how they can be lasered. . . I don’t think it’s very confusing if I read.
Um. . . They are designed to block microwave frequencies used through mobile phones.
For more than five years I have been storing my electronics in microwave ovens. Of course, I check it with my mobile phone and in some of them I find leaks. You are right. More than 60% of them have significant leaks. I put aluminum foil on the back of the leak doors. This prevents leakage both times. On my steel trash cans, I have to seal the lids with duct tape to prevent leaks. I bet we all do more to deal with non-public EMP errors than all of our government agencies. Sad
Wouldn’t 0. 1249 meters be about 125 mm, 12. 5 mm?
For wavelength, yes. But then you divide by 10 to get the ideal mesh size, so 125mm becomes 12. 5mm. Looking back, I see that this possibly wouldn’t be very transparent in the way I phrased it.
And I went to school once! Thanks for the clarification!
If we look at kitchens around the world, it is true that most people do not have microwaves. https://www. gapminder. org/dollar-street/matrix?thing=Kitchens
This was meant to be a reaction to Steven13 saying, “I’m pretty sure most people don’t own microwaves. “
People simply assume that this kind of thing doesn’t exist in their everyday lives. That’s crazy.
I’m about 0. 33 of the way through Factfulness (like many eBooks, I might give you all the data in an eBook that’s less than such a long chunk).
Leaving a complete look of the cage is pretty silly: you may have achieved effects by banging your device into a steel bucket. Since the housing is larger than a portion of a wavelength at the frequencies you are using, there will be state waves in the housing. That will make the functionality dependent on the precise location of the device.
Just wrapping the screen around the bottom edges of the side walls and setting the box on top of another piece of screen would be a good start. That’s likely to only make contact at a few points, and ideally the gaps between contact points should be just as small as the openings in the screen. Weighing it down will encourage better contact, but for really good performance you want some sort of springy contact arrangement — copper finger stock or foam wrapped in fine metal mesh are the usual approaches, but you’re not likely to find those at Home Depot.
Next time, check out a steel mosquito net. It is a fine mesh designed to keep insects away as much as possible.
It is discovered in the same store spaces as doors and windows, or door thresholds and insulations.
When I play Skylanders on the WiiU, I like to use the old Wii controllers, but as long as the WiiU can see its own controller, it refuses to connect to the old ones. Once I figured out what was going on, I put the original Controller in the microwave and it didn’t have any more problems. Of course, don’t take it out before reheating the coffee!
For those of us who are *not* aware of this kind of thing: if we go through a shorter mesh length than calculated, is the cage *more* efficient?And/or if we overlap (and offset) layers of mesh, will that also make the cage more efficient?
A finer mesh may help a little, but it’s usually not the weak link if you’ve followed the rule of thumb of “holes less than 1/10th of a wavelength. “Leaks usually occur when the mesh layers don’t produce electricity at all. When touched, they may overlap (or only touch each other in some places, or oxides and other elements prevent metal-to-metal contact). Jumbo overlays provide capacitive coupling, which is useful even when the conductive contact is absent or uneven.
Once you’ve established good contact around all the edges of your mesh and are looking to get still better shielding, then moving to a finer mesh or solid walls becomes a relevant consideration.
Let’s say you use aluminum foil and place the floor in the cage, and your circuit under control is a resonant circuit (in particular, I have an LC circuit and I operate it with a hundred watts of power).
The capacity of the cage will depend on the resonance of the circuit, right?If the C in your LC formula is around 0. 5 pF, the cage will particularly load into it and replace the oscillation frequency.
In addition, if the cage is enlarged, the domain corresponds to that of the radius, so a larger box provides a greater parasitic capacity.
Is all this analysis?
A larger cage has a larger surface area, but requires more separation of surfaces. If you place the device roughly in the middle of the box, the capacity between the parts of your device and the walls of the box will be less during a larger box.
Whether the capacitance between the box and the relevant bit of your circuit is any significant fraction of 0.5pF depends completely on what you’ve built and how. A device built following good RF design habits shouldn’t notice the box in the slightest unless you’ve set an exposed part of the device very close the metal (or if it has an antenna that you’re also putting in the box), because those habits are built around preventing that kind of uncontrolled parasitic interaction.
>The capacity of the cage goes to the resonance of the circuit, right?
But with the equivalence of the “far side” and there are an infinite number of equivalent near and far sides, I think the query is debatable.
I’m guessing the floor doesn’t matter because the RF radiation already has an incredibly simple path to the floor (i. e. in the air directly from the transmitting antenna). His shield wouldn’t give RF a longer path to earth.
Grounding in higher frequencies is a headache; Grounding this cage with a good, strong rope is just as effective as letting it float. A wide braid would be fine; like the shielding of a coaxial cable. Remove insulation from a coaxial cable; use it as a gasket around the detachable part and make sure it is tight and securely attached; and bury the other end of the cable as deep and as long as possible.
Beware of the surely outlandish things that can happen in the presence of lightning.
Hello, I am an electrical contractor and I have noticed and heard of cases of lightning doing “strange things. ” Do you have any ideas on how to locate the rays in his Farday cage if he places it on the ground?
I think grounding would possibly be more important if wires came out of the box. However, if the cables are shielded and the shield is securely hooked to the housing, the cage extends well over the life of the cable.
I did this in my space when it was built, only partly intentionally. I grew up in a domain where the Adobe-style structure is very popular and mandatory in some communities. To make the stucco adhere to the outside of the space, I used a very thin (1/16 inch) cord mesh with the edges folded (so the two pieces are sandwiched). For the windows, I used a few in particular designed to block UV rays and bright light by hitting a metallic plastic between them. layers of glass (plastic is very similar to that used in anti-static bags). The windows also had a steel frame that I was able to use conductive glue to attach to the mesh of the walls.
The entry way was designed as an airlock / mud room type design to prevent cool air from escaping, but also causes the cage to remain unbroken even with one of the doors open. Both the front and back doors are designed like this. Really, the only holes in the cage are the galvanized air exhaust vents in the roof and where the power lines enter the house (Although I am working on combining a pair of construction generators to build a power conditioner / flywheel. So might enclose it into its own cage in the garage). I get my internet via fiber optics and elected not to have any other form of communication line installed (there really isn’t any point in this day and age). I have cell service via a micro-cell I have on my network.
Initially, I built my space this way just because I realized it was imaginable without a lot of effort and money, but now I’m getting into DIY with RF and it’s really useful.
I use a 325 stainless steel metal mesh sieve cut to be compatible with the lid of the NIDO Milk Powder Can to complement the metal coating on my milk carton that I used for short-range determinations and the radio directional search.
I also made sure to use an aluminum screen for the entrances and exits of my farm construction, which is covered in metal, there is still room for improvement where more elaborate designs are used, especially I think, windows covered with copper screens or maybe there are tints. they are effective at more than the AM diversity I’ve been looking for.
In the higher frequencies in microwaves and more. . . Forged steel welds are needed and special reflective fabrics also do no damage, i. e. like some oxides when you get in the IR diversity and the lead in the ionizing diversity is better known.
At lower frequencies, an anechoic chamber design is required for audible levels and, if the steel is not thick enough; Steel can resonate to some degree to create other combinations, sun umbrellas and sun umbrellas depending on the design, the tension, I guess or just the resonance of the design of the sun umbrellas if the steel is forged. relationship with a screen. Because of the harmonics of drum diaphragms, they cause more signals because they are more than just basic frequency harmonics typical of other designs.
I’ve been informed that an intermodule shipping container buried underground a certain depth is a good idea. Couple with the above said and other thoughts. Figure how to baffle and screen the intakes and exhaust as well as couple signals in and out with monitoring for background scanning subtraction if required if you’re really serious is a must.
Burying an intermodal container sounds smart, but it’s really not. Cargo boxes are designed to weigh only on the quick-contact parts (mainly in the corners) and can give a lot under pressure on the middle parts. An example might be just four feet of rainy dirt piled on top of the roof. Also, shipping boxes are rainproof but not designed to be waterproof.
Right, I can upload a code for footing, foundation, with walls and a poured roof. Taking into account the proper drainage for the geological conditions. Most likely, they will be walls filled with 8″ cinder blocks and a thick perimeter regularly poured with rebar. Yes. . . Burying a shipping container between modules is definitely a bad concept without considering the code requirements. Even the floors are bad to divulge and it’s anything that deserves to be replaced.
Technically, the point of the intermodule shipping container is an easier to make commercial off the shelf was a welded sealed container is better than screen only Faraday Cage. I’ve even thought about spray foam lining maybe wouldn’t hurt outside the poured structure of which when pouring will need support beams inside for 30 days so the cement can cure enough. That would somewhat act like an outer Anechoic Chamber.
Even better is finding geological formations that are better at shielding like I’m guessing higher iron deposit areas and other minerals kind of like Cheyenne Mountain and other deep mine/cave systems operations. I’ve wondered about real time actuator controls also on the springs used in between the footing and Faraday Cage to inverse lower frequency vibration that could get in… sort of like placing the whole system on a dampening table.
Yesterday I was thinking about a conductive paint concept and forgot to post it. A ferro-organic or even reclaimed floor with more effective filling, powdered if desired, metallic paint can also simply be a resin-on-canvas option, a bit like fabric instead of fiberglass. . . especially if certain shapes are desired. It appears that conductive polymers may also be a domain of opportunity. It turns out that the concept or effective curtain silicone would be more insulating, as well as flexible, mobile, and I think even portable if placed over a layer of EMI/RFI protective fabric.
The comment section for this video is priceless. So many people are so scared and insecure today….makes me scared to be around them. Like I need to go buy a gun and put it on my wall and then build a metal box to sleep inside of.
Uhhhh, is this real? Because I’m not a wise person, I guess a real EMP would make such magnets useless and the sides would fall off, the relays and pacemakers would burn out. Oh, where are the risks?
The comment above is around 10:40 p. m. and for at least a minute and helps keep watching for another minute.
I don’t have one because I don’t want it. If I wanted to, I would figure out how to get it or create one. A lot of hackers don’t have a lot of stuff. No, even if I wanted to, I wouldn’t have an indoor area for it.
A uW oven works well. https://www. youtube. com/watch?v=2qfnvLH3TPE
So, I’m wondering if it would be less expensive or less difficult to mass-produce a copper-clad metal cord mesh. You can use electrolysis. You can buy grounding rods like that at the hardware store, so it works.
I don’t know, but I do know that galvanizing anything with copper is undeniable and cheap.
I wonder what is, or can be, the maximum cost-effective COTS formula that can certify appliances to FCC CFR specifications. It looks like an anechoic chamber and the Faraday cage is a start.
It occurred to me to leave this reference here with a note about the diathermy device reference: https://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Faraday_cage
Interesting read. Would the adhesive back lining used to coat the glass on microwaves serve the same function? I see this “black mesh” on public Bus windows and all microwaves…can it be purchased?
Be kind and respectful to make the comment segment great. (Comment Policy)
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.