Spacex continues to advance with the arrangements for flight 8 of Starship, ranging from the vehicle tests to the preparation of the launch.
According to him, it is clear, Booster 14 then finished his touchdown burn with the thirteen engines, adding the engine that was lit for the burn of the back. The tower then caught it, which makes it the super heavy moment to do so.
See AlsoSpaceX Starship ProgramL2 SpaceX SectionNSF StoreClick here to Join L2
However, ship 33, the first Block 2 sent flying, did not go well. Giving the ascent, a chimney plate can be noticed coming out of the rear flap engine port, indicating an imaginable chimney plate over the engine balm shield used to protect the rear dome during Hot Staging. Spacex CEO Elon Musk said it would possibly be a leak greater than the shipment’s ventilation capacity.
Since Ship 25, SpaceX has had vents installed in this area of the aft section to help passively vent any leaked Liquid Oxygen or Liquid Methane out of the Ship. Due to this issue, Ship 33’s engines slowly started to cut out one after another as systems got damaged, much like with Booster 7 on Flight 1.
Eventually, the flight termination formula was triggered or there was an internal overpressure event, and Shipment 33 experienced an anomaly exploding at a higher altitude near the Turks and Caicos Islands over the Atlantic Ocean.
– FAA ✈️ (@FaEws) January 17, 2025
According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the debris were left out of the doors of the original danger zones, which leads to the activation of a debris reaction zone to redirect or safely. Spacex to carry out a turn of the destination research on why this anomaly occurred.
This flight is a setback for the ship’s ship program because there were many systems that Spacex looked Solve those problems. temporarily and fly again.
In addition to double checking for leaks, we will raise fire abolition to this volume and shudder.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 17, 2025
Regarding imaginable corrections for this failure, groups can load more ventilation capacity or, as Elon Musk said, upload a formula for the abolition of fires to send as reinforcement. The loading of a formula for cutting fires to the shipment can simply take time because the crews deserve to load devices to shipping and modify the tower and the disconnection of the sending temporarily to fill the shipment of carbon dioxide.
The Ship may have been lost, but on the bright side, SpaceX did catch another Booster, which is currently in Mega Bay 1 getting looked over and possibly refurbished for a second flight.
The other part of ship 34, Booster 15, is recently located in Mega Bay 1 and has just begun to get its fins from the network in the last week. The reinforcement 15 would possibly take a position for a static fire capacity of the week or the next two.
Since Send 33 may not satisfy the maximum of the objectives of your project, Spacex will probably make some other suborbital flight to verify a block block. If Send 33 had achieved all its objectives, it is imaginable that Send 34 can be the first shipment of orbit with an imaginable attempt to capture.
The Ken Flight 8 date is a great consultation brand. Over time, two pieces will be the date, the preparation of cars and regulatory problems. Using the preparation of the vehicle beyond, the 34 ship can also be in a position through the end of February. However, assuming that Booster 15 follows the Booster 14 timeline 14, it would not be possible in a position until April, however, that does not take into account the fastest production processes of Spacex.
The regulatory aspect is now more confusing than the last 3 releases, since Spacex will have to conduct an incident investigation and cannot fly until the research is complete or Spacex obtains an exemption to protection. Since the FAA said that the debris fell from doors the danger zones and the fgentles had to be diverted, Spacex would possibly have difficulty obtaining an exemption. This means that the disconnection panel for some other release would not possibly occur until the FAA provides the soft green after Spacex in the investigation.
Flight 9 and Beyond
After sending 34, we have sent 35, which is just a shy segment to be absolutely stacked. Assuming that it is totally stacked in the next two weeks, shipping 35 would not be in a position before April or May. With respect to the objectives, Send 35 can also be the first shipment of orbit with an attempt to capture the PAD B in Starbase, not the pad A.
Here is where problems arise regarding vehicle combinations. Booster 16 is currently fully stacked but was only finished a month ago. Based on the quickest Booster readiness timeline, which is Booster 14 at eight months, that would mean Booster 16 may not be ready for flight at the end of August.
As always, these deadlines use older cars, and Spacex can accelerate tests and retirement outfit. However, assuming that Booster 16 will not be in a position for several months, Spacex can finally reuse Booster 14 to download another flight. Withdrawing the right moment of reinforcement that landed would not have precedents, because Spacex did the same with the moment Falcon 9. Who landed.
After Ship 35 and Booster 16, things get a lot more murky. Currently, Booster 17 is being stacked in Mega Bay 1, which is still a Block 1 Booster. It is unknown if this is the last Block 1 booster to be made. Once SpaceX gets into Block 2 of Booster, Pad B’s readiness also comes into play in terms of hardware and on the regulatory side.
In terms of shipments, nose cones for 36 boat, 37 boat and 38 boat can be noticed in production stages. With the option of booster cooldown and reuse through the end of the year, vehicle combinations will be harder to predict.
Outstanding Image: Booster 14 on the Orbital Liberation Mount after flight 7 (Credit: Bocachicagal for NSF).
© 2005-2023 – nasaspaceflight. com